Skip to content

ETL-605: Support stateless transform #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
PabloPardoGarcia wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ETL-605: Support stateless transform #62

PabloPardoGarcia wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

@PabloPardoGarcia
Copy link
Member

@PabloPardoGarcia PabloPardoGarcia commented Dec 12, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Coverage

Test Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
glassflow/etl
   __init__.py50100% 
   api_client.py64592%70–73, 123
   client.py39489%59–61, 141
   dlq.py41295%45, 70
   errors.py270100% 
   pipeline.py146795%334–337, 350, 406–407
   tracking.py260100% 
   utils.py11110%1, 3, 6, 8–11, 17–18, 22, 28
glassflow/etl/models
   __init__.py110100% 
   base.py10460%7–10
   config.py34876%37, 40–41, 43–45, 47–48
   data_types.py770100% 
   filter.py17288%16, 22
   join.py51296%44, 80
   metadata.py40100% 
   pipeline.py98297%156, 159
   schema.py260100% 
   sink.py61788%33, 39, 47, 49, 53, 55, 61
   source.py132794%47, 51, 68, 81, 124, 150, 166
   stateless_transformation.py44784%42, 46, 50, 62, 64, 66, 73
TOTAL9246892% 

@PabloPardoGarcia PabloPardoGarcia changed the title Support stateless transform ETL-605: Support stateless transform Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ashish-bagri ashish-bagri Awaiting requested review from ashish-bagri

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

bump:patch

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@PabloPardoGarcia